May 20, 2013, 09:38:35 am
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Home
Help
Search
Register
Login
Professor Ted Azarmi's Forum
>
Principles of Corporate Finance: MBA and Master's Level (Principles of Corporate Finance, 9th edition, Brealey, Myers, and Allen) Heilbronn 2010 (Prior lectures at Cal State, International University of Japan, And the University of Wisconsin-Madison)
>
3.CFA. Capital Budgeting and Investment Return Calculation (a CFA integrated lecture)
>
Homework 3
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
« previous
next »
Print
Author
Topic: Homework 3 (Read 8073 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Ted Azarmi
Administrator
Super Hero
Offline
Posts: 422
Homework 3
«
on:
November 14, 2009, 09:00:00 pm »
The Homework is attached.
[color=red][font=Verdana]Please register to see the attached files.[/font][/color]
«
Last Edit: December 27, 2009, 10:50:49 am by Ted Azarmi
»
Logged
prariyadi
Silver Member
Offline
Posts: 5
Re: Homework 3
«
Reply #1 on:
December 03, 2009, 01:16:46 pm »
For IRR - I use Excel to solve.
1. Assume a project has normal cash flows (that is, the initial cash flow is negative, and all other cash flows are positive). Which of the following statements is most correct?
answer: B All else equal, a project’s NPV increases as the cost of capital declines.
[i]A project’s NPV is positive and increases as a result of decrease in cost of capital
[/i]
4. As the director of capital budgeting for Denver Corporation, you are evaluating two mutually exclusive projects with the following net cash flows:
Yr Cash Flow X Cash Flow Y
0 -100,000 -100,000
1 50,000 10,000
2 40,000 30,000
3 30,000 40,000
4 10,000 60,000
If Denver’s cost of capital is 15 percent, which project would you choose?
Answer: A. Neither project.
[i]NPV X = -100,000 + (50,000/1.15) + (40,000/1.15²) + (30,000/1.15³) + (10,000/1.5^4)
= -50,803.31
NPV Y = -100,000 + (10,000/1.15) + (30,000/1.15²) + (40,000/1.15³) + (60,000/1.5^4)
= -56,998.65[/i]
5. Two projects being considered are mutually exclusive and have the following projected cash flows: If the required rate of return on these projects is 10 percent, which would be chosen and why?
Answer: A. Project B because it has the higher NPV.
[i]NPV A = -50,000 + (15,625/1.10) + (15,625/1.10²) + (15,625/1.10³) + (15,625/1.10^4)
= -470.85
NPV B = -50,000 + (0/1.10) + (0/1.10²) + (0/1.10³) + (99,500/1.10^4)
= -0.735
IRR A = 9.56%
IRR B = 18.77%[/i]
6. The capital budgeting director of Sparrow Corporation is evaluating a project that costs $200,000, is expected to last for 10 years and produce after-tax cash flows, including depreciation, of $44,503 per year. If the firm’s cost of capital is 14 percent and its tax rate is 40 percent, what is the project’s IRR?
Answer: C 18%
7. An insurance firm agrees to pay you $3,310 at the end of 20 years if you pay premiums of $100 per year at the end of each year for 20 years. Find the internal rate of return to the nearest whole percentage point.
ANSWER: C 5%
[i]IRR=0+(-100/(1+IRR))+(-100/(1+IRR)^2 )+ … +((-100+3310)/(1+IRR)^20 ) [/i]
8. A company is analyzing two mutually exclusive projects, S and L, whose cash flows are shown below:
Years 0 1 2 3
| | | |
S -1,100 1,000 350 50
L -1,100 0 300 1,500
The company’s cost of capital is 12 percent, and it can obtain an unlimited amount of capital at that cost. What is the regular IRR (not MIRR) of the better project, that is, the project that the company should choose if it wants to maximize its stock price?
Answer: D 19.08%
[i]NPV Project S= -1100+1000/(1+12%)^1 +350/(1+12%)^2 +50/(1+12%)^3 =107.46
NPV Project L= -1100+0/(1+12%)^1 +300/(1+12%)^2 +1500/(1+12%)^3 =206.83
IRR Project L=19.075%[/i]
9. 9 Your company is choosing between the following non-repeatable, equally risky, mutually exclusive projects with the cash flows shown below. Your cost of capital is 10 percent. How much value will your firm sacrifice if it selects the project with the higher IRR?
Project S: 0 1 2 3
| | | |
-1,000 500 500 500
Project L: 0 1 2 3 4 5
| | | | | |
-2,000 668.76 668.76 668.76 668.76 668.76
Answer: B
[i]IRR Project S = 23.375%
IRR Project L = 20.00%
We choose project S – IRR project S is higher than IRR project L
NPV Project S= -1000+500/((1+10%)^1)+500/(1+10%)^2 +500/(10+10%)^3 =243.43
NPV Project L= -2000+668.76/(1+10%)^1 +668.76/(1+10%)^2 668.76/(1+10%)^3 668.76/(1+10%)^4 668.76/(1+10%)^5 =535.13
How much value will your firm sacrifice if it selects the project with the higher IRR
= NPV Project S – NPV Project L
= 535.13 – 243.43 = 291.7[/i]
10.Green Grocers is deciding among two mutually exclusive projects. The two projects have the following cash flows:
Project A Project B
Year Cash Flow Cash Flow
0 -$50,000 -$30,000
1 10,000 6,000
2 15,000 12,000
3 40,000 18,000
4 20,000 12,000
The company’s weighted average cost of capital is 10 percent (WACC = 10%). What is the net present value (NPV) of the project with the highest internal rate of return (IRR)?
Answer: e. $15,200
IRR Project A = 21.38%
IRR Project B = 19.28%
NPV Project A= -50000+10000/1.1+15000/〖1.1〗^2 +40000/〖1.1〗^3 +20000/〖1.1〗^4 =15,200.46
11.Projects X and Y have the following expected net cash flows:
Project X Project Y
Year Cash Flow Cash Flow
0 -$500,000 -$500,000
1 250,000 350,000
2 250,000 350,000
3 250,000
Assume that both projects have a 10 percent cost of capital. What is the net present value (NPV) of the project that has the highest IRR?
Answer : d. $107,438.02
IRR Project A = 23.38%
IRR Project B = 25.69%
NPV Project B= -500,000+350,000/1.1+350,000/〖1.1〗^2 =107,438
12. Company C is considering two mutually exclusive projects, Project A and Project B. The projects are equally risky and have the following cash flows:
Project A Project B
Year Cash Flow Cash Flow
0 -$300 -$300
1 140 500
2 360 150
3 400 100
At what cost of capital would the two projects have the same net present value (NPV)?
Answer: d. 25%
X = Cost of capital
NPV Project A=NPV Project B
-300+ 140/(1+X)^1 +360/(1+X)^2 +400/(1+X)^3 = -300+ 500/(1+X)^1 +150/(1+X)^2 +100/(1+X)^3
-300+300+ 140/(1+X)^1 +360/(1+X)^2 +400/(1+X)^3 - 500/(1+X)^1 -150/(1+X)^2 -100/(1+X)^3 =0
-360/(1+X)^1 +210/(1+X)^2 +300/(1+X)^3 =0
Using Excel – X = 25%
Logged
yhayduch
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 4
Homework #3 Capital Budgeting and Investment Return Calculation
«
Reply #2 on:
January 20, 2010, 11:54:26 pm »
[b]Question #1[/b]
The right answer is that all else equal, a project’s NPV increases as the cost of capital declines.
For instance: NPV = -100 + 50/1.15
[b]Question #4[/b]
NPV: PV – Required Investment
co + (C1/1+r) + (C2/1+r)^2 + (C3/1+r)^3….
NPV Project X = -100000 + (50000/1.15) + (40000/1.15^2) + (30000/1,15^3) + (10000/1.15^4) = -832.97
NPV Project Y = -100000 + (10000/1.15) + (30000/1.15^2) + (40000/1.15^3) + (60000/1.15^4) = -8014,19
Answer a, Neither of the Projects
[b]Question #5[/b]
NPV Project A = -50000 + (15625/1.1) + (15625/1.1^2) + (15625/1,1^3) + (15625/1.1^4) + (15625/1.1^5) = 9.231
NPV Project B = -50000 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + (99500/1.1^5) = 11.781
Answer a, Project B because it has the higher NPV
[b]Question #9[/b]
NPV Project S = - 1000 + (500/1.1) + (500/1.1^2) + (500/1,1^3) = 243.43
NPV Project L = - 2000 + (668.76/1.1) + (668.76/1.1^2) + (668.76/1.1^3) + (668.76/1.1^4) + (668.76/1.1^5) = 535.13
$ 535.13 – $ 243.43 = $ 291.70
Answer b, $ 291.70
[b]Question #11[/b]
NPV Project X = -500000 + (250000/1.1) + (250000/1.1^2) + (250000/1.1^3) = $ 121,713.00
NPV Project Y = -500000 + (350000/1.1) + (350000/1.1^2) = $ 107,438.02
Answer d, $ 107,438.02
[b]Question #12[/b]
Get ∆ of cash flows
Get IRR = 25%
At 25% both projects will have the same NPV
Logged
mpeiris
Silver Member
Offline
Posts: 5
Re: Homework 3
«
Reply #3 on:
January 24, 2010, 02:00:01 am »
Capital Budgeting & Investment Return Calculation
Q1: Ranking Methods
A1: B | With the increase of the positive cash inflows the NPV decreases and therefore the cost of capital decreases. The IRR is not influenced by the cost of capital.
Q2: Ranking Conflicts
A2: A
Q3: NPV Profiles
A3: B | Project A has larger cash flows in the later years
Q4: NPV
A4: A | Assume Project X and Y are mutually exclusive
Year 0 1 2 3 4
Cash Flow X -$100 000 50 000 40 000 30 000 10 000
Cash Flow Z -$100 000 10 000 30 000 40 000 60 000
Cost of Capital: i=15%
Project X: NPV= -$100000 + (50000/1.15) + (40 000/1.15²) + (30 000/1.15³) + (10 000/1.154)
= - 100000+ 43478.26 + 30245.75 + 19725.45 + 5717.53 = -8330
Project Y: NPV=-$100000+ (10 000/1.15) + (30 000/1.15²) + (40 000/1.15³) + (60 000/1.154)
= - 100000+ 8695.65+ 22684.31 + 26300.65+ 34305.19= -8014.20
Both NPV’s are negative; therefore neither project should be conducted
Q5: NPV
A5: A | Assume Project A and B are mutually exclusive
Same procedure as in question 4
Decide for the Project with the highest NPV, which in this case is Project B
Q6: IRR
A6: C | Tax Rate and Cost of Capital are not relevant.
Cash flows: -$200 000 + $44503…after 10 years..+$44503
IRR? NPV=0=-$200 000 + $44503/1.1 + $44503/1.1²…after 10 years..+$44503/1.110
Use financial calculator: 18%
Q7: IRR
A7: C | IRR=0+(-100/(1+IRR))+(-100/(1+IRR)² )+ … +((-100+3310)/(1+IRR)20 )
IRR=5%
Q8: IRR and mutually exclusive projects
A8: D | Assume the Projects S and L are mutually exclusive
Step 1: Calculate the NPV of both projects S and L
NPV Project S= -1100+1000/(1+12%)^1 +350/(1+12%)^2 +50/(1+12%)^3 =107.46
NPV Project L= -1100+0/(1+12%)^1 +300/(1+12%)^2 +1500/(1+12%)^3 =206.83
Choose L as it has the higher NPV. Calculate IRR.
IRR=19.075%
Q9: IRR and NPV
A9: B | Step 1: calculate the IRR of Project S and L
IRR Project S = 23.375%
IRR Project L = 20.00%
Choose S because IRR is higher.
Step 2: Calculate the NPV of Project S and L
NPV Project S= -1000+500/((1+10%)^1)+500/(1+10%)^2 +500/(10+10%)^3 =243.43
NPV Project L= -2000+668.76/(1+10%)^1 +668.76/(1+10%)^2 668.76/(1+10%)^3 668.76/(1+10%)^4 668.76/(1+10%)^5 =535.13
NPV Project S – NPV Project L=243.43-535.13=291.7
Q10: NPV and IRR
A10: E | IRR Project A = 21.38%
IRR Project B = 19.28%
NPV Project A= -50000+10000/1.1+15000/1.1^2 +40000/1.1^3 +20000/1.1^4 =15,200.46
Q11: NPV and IRR
A11: D | IRR Project A = 23.38% IRR Project B = 25.69%
NPV Project B= -500,000+350,000/1.1+350,000/1.1^2 =107,438
Q12: Crossover rates
A12: D |
Calculate ∆ of cash flows A and B
Year Cash FlowA Cash FlowB A - B
0 -$300 -$300 $0
1 140 500 -360
2 360 150 210
3 400 100 300
i = 25%
Logged
Anastasia Nerlikh
Silver Member
Offline
Posts: 5
Re: Homework 3
«
Reply #4 on:
January 24, 2010, 01:19:03 pm »
Q.4
Year Cash Flow X Cash Flow Y
0 -100,000 -100,000
1 50,000 10,000
2 40,000 30,000
3 30,000 40,000
4 10,000 60,000
Cost of capital is 15%
1.Solving for Project X:
0: -100000
1:50000/1.15=43,478.26
2:40000/1.15^2=30,245
3:3000/1.15^3=19,736,8
4:10000/1.15^4=5,717.55
NPV of X = 43,478.26+30,245+19,736,8+5,717.55-100000=-824.
2.Solving for Project Y:
0:-100000
1:10000/1.15=8,695.6
2:30000/1.15^2=22,684.3
3:4000/1.15^3=26,315.8
4:60000/1.15^4=34,305
NPV of Y=8,695.6+22,684.3+26,315.8+34,305-100000= -8000.
Answer a:neither project,since both of them have negative NPV.
Q.5
Year Cash Flow A Cash Flow B
0 -50,000 -50,000
1 15,625 0
2 15,625 0
3 15,625 0
4 15,625 0
5 15,625 99,500
Cost of capital 10%
1.Solving for A:
0:-50000
1:15,625/1.1=14,204.5
2:15,625/1.1^2=12,913.2
3:15,625/1.1^3=11,739.3
4:15,625/1.1^4=10,672.08
5:15,625/1.1^5=9,701.9
NPV of A=14,204.5+12,913.2+11,739.3+10,672.08+9,701.9-50000=9,230.9
2.Solving for Project B:
0:-50000
1:0
2:0
3:0
4:0
5:99,500/1.1^5=61,781
NPV of B=61,781-50000=11,781
11,781>9,701.9
Answer a:we choose Project B,because its NPV is higher than of Project A.
Logged
pstrnad
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 4
Re: Homework 3
«
Reply #5 on:
January 24, 2010, 03:41:15 pm »
4.
Year CF X CF Y
0 -100,000 -100,000
1 50,000 10,000
2 40,000 30,000
3 30,000 40,000
4 10,000 60,000
Project X: NPV= -$1000,00 + (50,000/1.15) + (40,000/1.15^2) + (30,000/1.15^3) + (10,000/1.15^4)= -832.97
Project Y: NPV= -$100,000 + (10,000/1.15) + (30,000/1.15^2) + (40,000/1.15^3) + (60,000/1.15^4)= -8014.20
a. Neither of the projects, as both have a negative NPV!
5.
NPV A = -50,000 + (15,625/1.1) + (15,625/1.1^2) + (15,625/1,1^3) + (15,625/1.1^4) + (15,625/1.1^5) = 9,231.04
NPV B = -50,000 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + (99,500/1.1^5) = 11,781.67
ANSWER: a.Project B, because it has the higher NPV.
6. 0 = -20,000 + (44,503/(1+r)^1 (...) 44,503/(1+r)^10
Solved with Excel: IRR = 18%
7. 0 = (-100/(1+IRR)^1 (...) + (-100+3,310)/(1+IRR)^20
Solved with Excel: IRR = 5%
9.
NPV S = - 1000 + (500/1.1) + (500/1.1^2) + (500/1,1^3) = 243.43
NPV L = - 2000 + (668.76/1.1) + (668.76/1.1^2) + (668.76/1.1^3) + (668.76/1.1^4) + (668.76/1.1^5) = 535.13
535.13 – 243.43 = $ 291.70, answer b.
10.
Calculate IRR with Excel:
IRR: Project A = 21.38%
IRR: Project B = 19.28%
NPV: Project A= -50000+10000/1.1+15000/(1.1)^2 +40000/(1.1)^3 +20000/(1.1)^4 =15,200.46
11.
Answer : d. $107,438.02
Calculate IRR with Excel:
IRR: Project A = 23.38%
IRR: Project B = 25.69%
NPV Project B= -500,000 + 350,000/1.1+350,000/(1.1)^2 = 107,438
12.
CF A - CF B to get the following CFs: 0 ; -360; 210; 300
Using Excel to calculate IRR of these CFs: At 25% both projects have the same NPV
Logged
gieremie
Member
Offline
Posts: 2
Re: Homework 3
«
Reply #6 on:
January 24, 2010, 11:53:49 pm »
4. As the director of capital budgeting for Denver Corporation, you are evaluating two mutually
exclusive projects with the following net cash flows: If Denver’s cost of capital is 15 percent, which project would you choose?
Project X Project Z
Year Cash Flow Cash Flow
0 -$100,000 -$100,000
1 50,000 10,000
2 40,000 30,000
3 30,000 40,000
4 10,000 60,000
NPV: Co + (C1/1+r) + (C2/1+r)^2 + (C3/1+r)^3+(Cn/1+r)^n
NPV Project X = -100000 + (50000/1.15) + (40000/1.15^2) + (30000/1,15^3) + (10000/1.15^4) = - $832.97
NPV Project Y = -100000 + (10000/1.15) + (30000/1.15^2) + (40000/1.15^3) + (60000/1.15^4) = -$8014.19
The correct answer is A. (any of the projects can be taken).
5. Two projects being considered are mutually exclusive and have the following projected cash flows:
Project A Project B
Year Cash Flow Cash Flow
0 -$50,000 -$50,000
1 15,625 0
2 15,625 0
3 15,625 0
4 15,625 0
5 15,625 99,500
If the required rate of return on these projects is 10 percent, which would be chosen and why?
NPV: Co + (C1/1+r) + (C2/1+r)^2 + (C3/1+r)^3+(Cn/1+r)^n
NPV Project A = -50000 + (15625/1.1) + (15625/1.1^2) + (15625/1,1^3) + (15625/1.1^4) + (15625/1.1^5) = 9.231
NPV Project B = -50000 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + (99500/1.1^5) = 11.781
The correct answer is A, Project B, with a higher NPV.
8. There are two projects Project s and Project L with follow cash flows.
Project S Project L
Year Cash Flow Cash Flow
0 -$1100 -$1100
1 1000 0
2 350 300
3 50 1500
We have to select the project with highest positive NPV
Opportunity Cost of Capital is: r=12%
So, NPV Project S = -1100 + (1000/1.12) + (350/1.12^2) + (50/1,12^3) = 107.46
NPV Project L = -1100 + 0 + (300/1.12^2) + (1500/1.12^3) = 206.83
We have to select project L, because NPV is higher 107.46<206.83
And IRR we calculate with financial calculator or Excel and have 19 %.
Logged
bbulir
Silver Member
Offline
Posts: 5
Re: Homework 3
«
Reply #7 on:
January 28, 2010, 05:53:28 pm »
1) Ranking methods
The NPV of a project increases as the cost of capital declines. The IRR is not influenced by the cost of capital.
2) Ranking conflicts
The NPV method accepts all investments with a NPV>0, while the IRR method indicates reinvestment at IRR=0.
3) NPV profiles
Project A has larger cash flows in the later years, due to lower interest rates and higher NPV.
4) NPV Denver Corporation
Project X: NPV= -1000,000$ + (50,000/1.15) + (40,000/1.152) + (30,000/1.153) +
(10,000/1.154)= -832.97$
Project Y: NPV= -100,000$ + (10,000/1.15) + (30,000/1.152) + (40,000/1.153) +
(60,000/1.154)= -8014.20$
As both NPV’s are negative, none of the projects should be conducted by Denver Corp.
5) NPV
See 4) for procedure
Project A = -50,000 + (15,625/1.1) + (15,625/1.12) + (15,625/1,13) + (15,625/1.14) + (15,625/1.15) = 9,231.04$
Project B = -50,000 + (99,500/1.15) = 11,781.67
As Project B’s NPV is above Project A’s, the company will launch Project B.
6) IRR
NPV=0
0 = -200,000 + (44,503/(1+r)...after 10 years…+ 44,503/(1+r)10
Solved with Excel: IRR = 18%
7) IRR
NPV=0
0 = (-100/(1+IRR))+(-100/(1+IRR)² )+... + (-100+3,310)/(1+IRR)20
Solved with Excel: IRR = 5%
IRR and mutually exclusive projects S and L
NPV Project S= -1100+1000/(1+12%) +350/(1+12%)2 +50/(1+12%)3 =107.46$
NPV Project L= -1100+0/(1+12%) +300/(1+12%)2 +1500/(1+12%)3 =206.83$
Because Project L has the higher NPV, the company will launch it. IRR=19.075%
9) NPV and IRR
NPV S = - 1000 + (500/1.1) + (500/1.12) + (500/1,13) = 243.43$
NPV L = - 2000 + (668.76/1.1) + (668.76/1.12) + (668.76/1.13) + (668.76/1.14) + (668.76/1.15) = 535.13$
535.13 – 243.43 = 291.70$, as the amount of money, that the company would sacrifice, deciding on basis of IRR.
10) NPV and IRR
Project B IRR: = 19.28%
Project A IRR: = 21.38%
Project A NPV: = -50000+10000/1.1+15000/(1.1)2 +40000/(1.1)3 +20000/(1.1)4 = 15,200$
11) NPV and IRR
Project X IRR: = 23.38%
Project Y IRR: = 25.69%
Project Y NPV: = -500,000 + 350,000/1.1+350,000/(1.1)2 = 107,438$
12) Crossover Rate
Calculating CF-∆ of Projects A and B
Year CF A CF B ∆ A - B
0 -300 -300 0
1 140 500 -360
2 360 150 210
3 400 100 300
IRR = 25%
At 25% Cost of Capital, both projects will have the same NPV.
Logged
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
Print
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Call for Papers Teaching Finance in Turbulent Times Heilbronn, Germany, September 26/27, 2013
-----------------------------
=> Call for Papers
-----------------------------
Prof. Azarmi’s Venture Capital Demand Index --- Venture Capital Geschaeftsklima Index
-----------------------------
=> Prof. Azarmi's VC Index 2008-2010
=> Prof. Azarmi's Venture Capital Geschaeftsklima Index
-----------------------------
Joint Research and PhD Supervision at the University of Tuebingen 2005-2012
-----------------------------
=> Summer Research Retreat: July 26 - August 11, 2010
=> Research Grants and PhD Scholarships
=> Two-Stage Spinoff Asset Impairment Theory: the Spinoff of Kraft by Altria
=> The Impact of State Guarantees for Debt and Equity on Corporate Investment in Times of Financial Crisis: Theory and Tests
=> Venture Capital Demand Index
=> Cascading theory and art valuation; Stern stewart & Co. GmbH PhD Program
=> Ownership structure, bank risk, and market risk premium
=> LIBERALISATION OF CAPITAL MARKETS IN INDIA
=> Optimal Investment Structure for Growth-Stage Venture Capital Based on Characteristics of Target Firms
=> Integrated Risk Management: Modeling Market Risk with Fat Tails
=> A Clinical Study and a Consulting Tool for Real Rainbow Options
=> Structured Products: An analysis of securitized derivatives with exotic components
=> Does Culture Matter to Corporate Structure: Emprical Evidence of Culture's Influence on the Structure of the American, German, Indian, and Japanese board of Directors
=> Do private equity firms create value?
=> CREATING VALUE WITH HYBRID SECURITIES Evidence from the Structured Notes Market
=> Venture Capital in Poland and Its Contribution to Innovation
=> Gender in European Management Boards and Directors' Dealings
=> A clinical study of ThyssenKrupp’s restructuring efforts in the aftermath of S&P’s downgrade in 2003
=> The Impact of Leverage on Investment Decision and the Value of the Firm
-----------------------------
Thesis Supervision
-----------------------------
=> General dirrections for writting a thesis
-----------------------------
Book Recommendations: What Do I Read Besides Finance Textbooks and Journals!
-----------------------------
=> شاهنامه Shah.name of Ferdowsi
=> Dogs and Demons by Alex Kerr
-----------------------------
Finance Career Forum: Consulting, Investment Banking, Venture Capital, Private Equity, Fund Management, and Corporate Finance
-----------------------------
=> Internships and Employment Opportunities Announcements
=> Consulting Work Experience
=> Investment Banking Application and Job Market Experience
=> Consulting Application and Job Market Experience
=> Internships Application and Job Market Experience
=> Investment Banking Work Experience
=> Venture Capital Work Experience
=> Private Equity Work Experience
-----------------------------
Homepages, Download Help, and Blogs
-----------------------------
=> My Working Papers and my webpages
=> Other Professors' and Finance Webpages
=> Inone consult
=> Drei Jungs auf Warrens Spuren
=> SJ McCall Dot Com
-----------------------------
Finance Academic Article Discussions (Journal of Financial Economics, Journal of Finance, and Review of Financial Studies, etc.) University of Tuebingen 2012, Heilbronn 2012
-----------------------------
=> How to get articles from The Journal of Finance, Journal of Financial Economics and Review of Financial Studies?
=> A case study in the design of an optimal production sharing rule for a petroleum exploration venture JFE 30 (1991) 45-67.
=> A Theory of Takeovers and Disinvestment, the Journal of Finance • Vol. LXII, No. 2, April, Bart M. Lambrecht, Stewart C. Myers, 2007
=> An analysis of value destruction and recovery in the alliance and proposed merger of Volvo and Renault, JFE 51 (1999) 125-166, Bruner, Robert F
=> AT&T’s acquisition of NCR, JFE 39 (1995) 353-378
=> Bank loan collateral in Spain, JFE 81 (2006), 255-281
=> Compeau: acquisition and valuation, JFE 25 (1989) 191-212
=> Campeau's acquisition of Federated: Post-bankruptcy results, Journal of Financial Economics, 1994, vol. 35, issue 1, pages 123-136, Kaplan, Steven Neil
=> CEO incentives and earnings management, Journal of Financial Economics, Volume 80, Issue 3, June, Pages 511 - 529 Bergstresser, Daniel, Thomas Philippon, 2006
=> Changing names with style: Mutual Fund Name Changes and Their Effects on Fund Flows, Cooper, Michael J, Huseyin Gulen, and P. Raghavendra Rau
=> Czech Mate: Expropriation and Investor Protection in a Converging World, Desai And Moel, Review of Finance (2008) 12: 221–251
=> City size and fund performance, Journal of financial economics volume 92, Christoffersen, Susan E.K. and Sergei Sarkissian
=> Corporate Financial Control Mechanism and Firm Performance: The Case of Value-Based Management Systems, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, January/March, Harley E. Ryan, Jr. and Emery A. Trahan (2007)
=> Corporate Issues of foreign currency exchange warrants, JFE 30 (1991) 347-366
=> Consequences of Leveraged Buyouts, Journal of Financial Economics 27, 247-262, Krishna G. Palepu, (1990).
=> Discount Dividend-Reinvestment and Stock-Purchase Plans, JFE 23, 1989 7-35
=> Convertible bonds as backdoor equity financing, Journal of Financial Economics 32, 3–21, Stein, J., (1992).
=> Do hedge funds deliver alpha? A Bayesian and bootstrap analysis, Kosowski, Naik and Teo check
=> Eastern Airlines: Bankruptcy
=> Editorial: Clinical Papers and Their Role in the Development of Financial Economics, JFE 24 (1989) 3-6
=> Factors affecting investment bank initial public offering market share, Journal of Financial Economics Vol. 55, Dunbar Craig G, 2000
=> General Dynamics: compensation, JFE 37 (1995) 261-314
=> General Mills: voluntary restructuring, JFE 27 (1990) 117-141
=> Growth opportunities and corporate debt policy: the case of the U.S. defense industry, JFE 64, 35-59, Vidhan K. Goyal, Kenneth Lehn and Stanko Racic, 2002
=> Hedge funds: performance, risk, and capital formation, (2008) by Fung, Hsieh, Naik and Ramadorai
=> Hedging foreign exchange risk with derivatives, JFE 60 (2001) 401-448
=> How Active Is Your Fund Manager? A New Measure That Predicts Performance, 2009, K. J. Martijn Cremers and Antti Petajisto
=> How Preussag Became TUI: A Clinical Study of Institutional Blockholders and Restructuring in Europe, Financial Management • Autumn 2008 • pages 571 – 598, Dittmann, Ingolf, Ernst Maug, and Christoph Schneider
=> How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value? JFE 80, 385–417, Belen Villalonga and Raphael Amit (2006)
=> Individual investor mutual fund flows, Journal of Financial Economics 92 (2009), Zoran Ivković & Scott Weisbrenner
=> Internet Investment Banking: The Impact Of Information Technology On Relationship Banking, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 12(1), pages 21-27, William J. Wilhelm, 1999.
=> Introduction; HBS-JFE Conference Volume: Complementary Research Methods, JFE 60 (2001) 179-185
=> Investing in Equity Mutual Funds, Lubos Pastor and Robert F. Stambaugh
=> Investment Bank Market Share, Contingent Fee Payments, and the Performance of Acquiring firms, Journal of Financial Economics 56, 293-324, P. Raghavendra Rau, (2000)
=> Initial Public Offerings: An Analysis of Theory and Practice, Journal of Finance, V. 61, No. 1 February 399-436, Brau, James C, and Stanley E. Fawcett, (2006)
=> Life insurance regulation: Junk bonds, JFE 41 (1996) 475-511
=> Linking pay to performance—compensation proposals in the S&P 500, JFE 62, 489-523, Angela G. Morgan and Annette B. Poulsen, (2001)
=> Motivations for public equity offers: An international perspective. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 87, Issue 2, Feb., pp. 281-307, Kim, W. and Weisbach, M. (2008).
=> NASDAQ and NYSE, JFE 41 (1996) 113-357 Anton Glotov
=> Nestle, JFE 37 (1995) 315-339
=> Partial Privatization and Firm Performance", JF LX, No.2 (2005), 987-1015
=> Paris Bourse, JFE 73 (2004) 3-36
=> Payout policy in the 21st century, JFE 77, 483-52, Alon Brav, John R. Graham, Campbell R. Harvey and Roni Michaely, (2005)
=> Private Equity Returns: Persistence and Capital Flows, Journal of Finance 60, p.1791-1823, Kaplan S.N.
=> Privatization at British Airways, JFE 43 (1997) 275-298
=> Privatization at France Telecom, JFE 71 (2004) 169-202
=> Real Estate Investment Funds: Performance and Portfolio Considerations Brueggeman, W. B, A. H. Chen and T. G. Thibodeau, 1984
=> Returns to Shareholder Activism: Evidence from a Clinical Study of the Hermes UK Focus Fund
=> Should Investors Bet on the Jockey or the Horse? Evidence from the Evolution of Firms from Early Business Plans to Public Companies, Journal of Finance 64, 75-115, Kaplan, Steven, Sensoy, Berk, Strömberg, Per, (2009)
=> Smart Institutions, Foolish Choices?: The Limited Partner Performance Puzzle, Journal of Finance 62, 731-764, Josh Lerner, Antoinette Schoar, and Wan Wong, (2007)
=> Partial Privatization and Firm Performance, JOURNAL OF FINANCE, V. 60, No. 2 April 2005
=> The Bulgarian Mass Privatization Auction, JFE 76 (2005) pg. 191-234
=> The Influence of Institutions on Corporate Governance through Private Negotiations: Evidence from TIAA-CREF" JF 53/4 (1998) 1335-1362
=> The Illiquidity Puzzle: Theory and Evidence from Private Equity, Journal of Financial Economics 72, 3-40, Lerner, Josh and Antoinette Schoar, (2004)
=> The Pakistani stock market, JFE 78 (2005) 203-241
=> The Behavior of Investment Bankers: An Econometrical Investigation, the Journal of Finance, Vol. 29, No. 1. 203-215, Dennis E. Logue, John R. Lindvall, (1974)
=> The Colors of Investors’ Money: The Role of Institutional Investors Around the World, Ferrera, Matos; 2007
=> The Effect of Investment Banking Relationships on Financial Analysts’ Earnings Forecasts and Investment Recommendations, Contemporary Accounting Research, fall, Dugar, Amitabh and Siva Nathan (1995)
=> The influence of professional investors on the failure of management buyout attempts
=> The Performance of Private Equity Funds, Review of Financial Studies 22, 1747-1776, Ludovic Phalippou, and Oliver Gottschalg, (2009)
=> The Practice Of Clinical Research, 2000, Harvard Business School, Donaldson, Gordon, http://www.ssrn.com/abstract= 251430
=> The Sealed Air Coporation, [Journal of Financial Economics 36 (1994) 157-192]
=> The 13 corporations for Alaskan natives, JFE 24 (1989) 69-105
=> The structure and governance of venture capital organizations, Journal of Financial Economics 27, 473–521, Harley E. Ryan, Jr. and Emery A. Trahan (2007)
=> The Turner Broadcasting Corporation, JFE 30 (1991) 325-346
=> Transferable put rights, JFE 25 (1989) 141-160
=> Unchecked intermediaries: Price manipulation in an emerging stock market
=> Was there too little entry during the Dot Com Era? Journal of Financial Economics 86, 100–144, Brent Goldfarba, David Kirscha, David A. Miller, (2007)
=> What do venture capitalists do? Journal of Business Venturing 4, 231–248, Gorman, M., Sahlman, W.A., (1989)
=> Withdrawn IPOs that Return to the Market Journal of Financial Economics 87, 610–635, Craig G. Dunbar, Stephen R. Foerster (2008)
-----------------------------
Harvard Business School Style Case Analysis and Case Presentations European School of Business MBA 2005-2010, University of Tuebingen 2005-2012, and Heilbronn 2010-2012
-----------------------------
=> Syllabus and how to purchase the Harvard case studies.
=> Creating Value Through Corporate Restructuring: Case Studies in Bankruptcies, Buyouts, and Breakups, Stuart C. Gilson 2nd eddition
=> Altoona State Investment Board: December 2008, Josh Lerner
=> Avid Radiopharmaceuticals: The Venture Debt Question, Matthew Rhodes-Kropf, Ann Leamon
=> Barings Bank, Ted Azarmi
=> Butler Capital Partners and Auto distribution: Putting Private Equity to Work in France Walter Kuemmerle, William J. Coughlin
=> Capital Alliance Private Equity: Creating a Private Equity Leader in Nigeria Walter Kuemmerle, Chad Ellis, William J. Coughlin
=> Children's Investment Fund, 2005, Randolph B. Cohen, Joshua B. Sandbulte
=> Chrysalis Capital: Venture Capital in an emerging Market, Robert E. Kennedy
=> Construction of inverse floaters
=> Corporate Governance in China, Ted Azarmi
=> Ethics Agency Conflicts and Investment Banking
=> Financial Engineering and Tax Risk the Case of Times Mirror PEPS
=> Hedging Currency Risks at AIFS
=> How Financial Engineering Can Advance Corporate Strategy
=> Home Equity Protection
=> Infinata: the Quest for Human Resource Venture Capital
=> Introduction to Corporate Financial Engineering
=> LOR Super Trust Financial Engineering Product
=> McDonald's, Wendy's, and Hedge Funds: Hamburger Hedging? David P. Stowell, Tim Moore, Jeff Schumacher
=> Morgan Stanley: Becoming a "One-Firm" Firm
=> Orchid Partners: A Venture Capital Start-up
=> Pedigree vs. Grit: Predicting Mutual Fund Manager Performance, Peter Eso, Graeme Hunter, Peter Klibanoff, Karl Schmedders
=> Rico Auto Industries: Raising Private Equity in India, G. Felda Hardymon, Ann Leamon
=> Roberts Enterprise Development Fund: Implementing a Social Venture Capital Approach to Philanthropy, Daniel Kessler, Jed Emerson, Melinda T. Tuan, Lauren Dutton
=> San Francisco Bay Consulting
=> Schroder Ventures: Launch of the Euro Fund, Josh Lerner, Kate Bingham, Nick Ferguson
=> Selecting Stocks for a Hedge Fund, Peter C. Bell, David Pietruszka
=> StartUp Capital Ventures, John Glynn, Peter Ziebelman, Bethany Coates
=> Strucured ATP Private Equity Partners
=> Student Educational Loan Fund, Inc. Peter Tufano, Cameron Poetzscher
=> The Blackstone Groups IPO
=> The Carlyle Group, Robert G. Eccles, Carin-Isabel Knoop
=> The Dynamis Fund: An Energy Hedge Fund, Yiorgos Allayannis, Alec Bocock
=> The Privatization of Rhone-Poulenc--1993
=> Term Sheet Negotiations at Trendsetter Inc
=> The Nikkei Case, Ted Azarmi
=> The Goldman Sachs: IPO
=> The China Unicom Incident
=> The Peregrine Debacle
=> Unilever Superannuation Fund vs. Merrill Lynch, Andre F. Perold, Joshua Musher, Robert Alloway
=> Vanguard Group, Inc., in 2006 and Target Retirement Funds, Luis M. Viceira
=> Venture Capital and Entrepreneurial Finance in China, Ted Azarmi
=> Walnut Venture Associates (A): RBS Group Investment Memorandum
=> Walt Disney Co's Yen Financing
=> Wit Capital: Evolution of the Online Investment Bank
-----------------------------
Finance Project, Haupt-Seminar, Clinical Studies & Empirical Research, University of Tuebingen 2005-2013, and Heilbronn 2010-2013
-----------------------------
=> Course Outline
=> How to get Financial Data for an Empirical or Clinical Study?
=> Tuebingen Clinical Studies Seminar 2012
=> Clinical Study Research Topics
=> Clinical Study and Case Studies Twins
=> Lectures
=> Research Presentations
-----------------------------
Financial Engineering (Source: Lectures by Ted Azarmi and Proprietary Software) European School of Finance MBA 2005-2010
-----------------------------
=> Structured Product Valuation and Analysis
-----------------------------
Management Consulting and Investment Banking (Source Harvard Business School Technical Notes) University of Tuebingen 2009
-----------------------------
=> Academic Article Summary
=> Idea Boards
=> Knowledge Management System
=> Harvard Business School Case Studies
=> Theoretical Tools
=> Practical Tools
-----------------------------
Venture Capital and Private Equity (Source Harvard Business School Technical Notes) University of Tuebingen 2010
-----------------------------
=> Tuebingen Venture Capital and Private Equity Seminar
=> Angel Investing
=> Due Diligence
=> Role of Private Equity Firms in Merger and Acquisition Transactions
=> Managing risk and rewards of a venture deal
=> Ethics in Venture Capital
=> Practice of Active Private Equity Firms in Latin America
=> Private equity in developing countries
=> Mezzanine Finance
=> Valuation in Private Equity Settings
=> Note on Antidilution Provisions: Typology and a Numerical Example
=> Module 1: Learning the basics: an introduction, valuation, and distribution in venture capital and private equity industry
=> Module 2: The Frontiers of Theory
=> Module 3: Venture Capital and Private Equity Technical Tools
=> Module 4: The Case Study Method
=> Theoretical Tools
=> Practical Tools
-----------------------------
Investment Fund Management: Hedge Funds, Fund of Funds, Pensions, Real Estate funds, Private Equity, Venture Capital, and Mutual Funds (Source Harvard Business School Technical Notes) University of Tuebingen 2010, and Heilbronn 2012
-----------------------------
=> Course Outline
=> Module 1: Learning the basics and an introduction to investment fund performance measurement, mutual funds, hedge funds and pension funds
=> Module 2: The Frontiers of Theory
=> Module 3: Fund Management Technical Topics
=> Module 4: The Case Study Method
=> Module 5: Internship and the Job Market
=> Module 6: Technical Writing: Producing Theoretical and Practical Knowledge Management Tools
=> Note on financial analysis
=> The basic venture capital formula
=> Retail financial services in 1988
=> When investing and social objectives meet
=> A note on valuation for venture capital
=> Note on valuing private businesses
=> trading on the market
=> Funding a new ventures: valuation, financing, and capitalization tables
=> How Institutional investors think about real estate
=> Real problem with pensions by Merton
-----------------------------
CFA® Preparation University of Tuebingen 2009-2012 Heilbronn 2011-2012
-----------------------------
=> Module I: Syllabus, Introduction, and Two Mock CFA Exams
=> CFA Level II Prepration Course at Tuebingen
=> Module II. Lecture 1: The Time Value of Money (Reading 5)
=> Module II. Lecture 2: Capital Budgeting and Investment Return Calculation (Reading 6)
=> Module II. Lecture 3: Cost of Capital (Reading 45)
=> Module II. Lecture 4: Ratio analysis and Working Capital Management (Reading 46 and 47)
=> Module II. Lecture 5: Portfolio Management and CAPM (Reading 49-51)
=> Module II. Lecture 6: Stock Valuation (56-59)
=> Module II. Lecture 7: Bond Valuation (61-66)
=> Module II. Lecture 8: Security Markets Indices and Market Efficiency (52-55)
=> Module II. Lecture 9: Corporate Governance (48)
=> Module II. Lecture 10: Options and Derivatives (67-74)
=> Module II. Lecture 11: Financial Statement Analysis (29-43)
=> Module II. Lecture 12: Money and Banking (Reading 24-28)
=> Module III. Lecture 1: Probability and Statistics (Readings 7-12)
=> Module IV. Lecture 1: Economics, Basic Review (Readings 13- 23)
=> Module V. Lecture 1: Ethics (Readings 1-4)
-----------------------------
International Finance (Source Harvard Business School Lecture Notes; Multinational Financial Management, 9th Edition, Alan C. Shapiro ) Heilbronn 2012 (prior lectures at University of Tuebingen, Cal State, Temple Uni; Int. Uni of Japan)
-----------------------------
=> Course Outline
=> Final Exam
=> Presentations
=> Triangular Arbitrage
=> Covered Interest Arbitrage
=> Foreign Exchange Rate Analysis
=> Lecture on using Excel in finance courses
=> The Walt Disney Company's Yen Financing
=> Hedging F/X Transaction Exposure
=> Value at Risk due to Foreign Subsidiary Operations: Barings Bank
=> Foreign Exchange Markets and the World Currencies
=> International Futures and Derivatives Markets: The Nikkei Case
=> Cross-Border Swap Cash-Flow Analysis and Valution
=> Corporate Governance in China
=> International Finance Theory and Parity Conditions
=> Venture Capital and Entrepreneurial Finance in China
=> International Financial Corporate Governance
=> Translation Methods and Strategies for Hedging a Multinational's Exposure to that Risk
=> Operational Exposure to International Real Macro Economic Shocks
=> Cross Border Investments and Valuation
=> Forecasting the Long Term Trend of Real Exchange Rates
-----------------------------
Principles of Corporate Finance: MBA and Master's Level (Principles of Corporate Finance, 9th edition, Brealey, Myers, and Allen) Heilbronn 2010 (Prior lectures at Cal State, International University of Japan, And the University of Wisconsin-Madison)
-----------------------------
=> 1. Finance and the Financial Manager
=> 2.CFA. Time value of money (a CFA integrated lecture)
=> 3.CFA. Capital Budgeting and Investment Return Calculation (a CFA integrated lecture)
=> 4.CFA. Cost of capital (a CFA integrated lecture)
=> 5. CFA Bond Valuation (a CFA Integrated Lecture)
=> 6. CFA Stock Valuation (a CFA Integrated Lecture)
=> 7. International. Cross Border Valuation
=> 8.CFA. Ratio Analysis and Working Capital Management (a CFA integrated lecture)
=> 9.CFA. Portfolio Management and CAPM (a CFA integrated lecture)
=> 2. Present Values, the Objectives of the Firm, and Corporate Governance
=> 3. How to Calculate Present Values
=> 4. Valuing Bonds
=> 5. The Value of Common Stocks
=> 6. Why Net Present Value Leads to Better Investment Decisions than Other Criteria
=> 7. Making Investment Decisions with the Net Present Value Rule
=> 8. Introduction to Risk, Return, and the Opportunity Cost of Capital
=> 9. Risk and Return
=> 10. Capital Budgeting and Risk
=> 11. Project Analysis
=> 12. Investment, Strategy, and Economic Rents
=> 13. Agency Problems, Management Compensation, and the Measurement of Performance
=> 14. Efficient Markets and Behavioral Finance
=> 15. An Overview of Corporate Financing
=> 16. How Corporations Issue Securities
=> 17. Payout Policy
=> 18. Does Debt Policy Matter?
=> 19. How Much Should a Firm Borrow?
=> 20. Financing and Valuation
=> 21. Understanding Options
=> 22. Valuing Options
=> 23. Real Options
=> 24. Credit Risk and the Value of Corporate Debt
=> 25. The Many Different Kinds of Debt
=> 26. Leasing
=> 27. Managing Risk
=> 28. Managing International Risks
=> 29. Financial Analysis and Planning
=> 30. Working Capital Management
=> 31. Short-Term Financial Planning
=> 32. Mergers
=> 33. Corporate Restructuring
=> 34. Governance and Corporate Control Around the World
=> 35. What We Do and Do Not Know About Finance
-----------------------------
Corporate Finance Valuation Course (Damodaran Investment Valuation, 2nd Edition) Heilbronn 2010-2012
-----------------------------
=> Course Outline
=> 1. Duration
=> 2. WACC, Real World Example, Debt-Equity Ratio, Look Up Today's Risk Free Rate, Where do we get Debt-equity ratio in practice for a public firm?
=> 2. Cost of capital
=> 3. NPV Calculation Based on future cash-flows calculated from pro Forma Income Statements.
=> 3. Valuation with DCF
=> 4. Variance of a log of stock and bond prices and returns and correlation of their prices: Measuring risk for valuation
=> 5. Valuing Equity in Bankruptcy based on an option on underlying assets of the firm (see HW data)
=> 6. Option Valuation wBlack and Scholes compare to real option market pricesith
=> 7. Valuing real estate Ch 26-27 Damodaran
=> 8. Valuing young and start-up firms
=> 9. Valuing Firms that have Negative Earnings
=> 10. Valuing Emerging Market Firms
=> 11. Valuation of private Companies
=> 12. Valuing Alternative Assets, Hedge Funds, Mutual Funds
=> 13, Approaches to Valuation, and Review of Basic Methods
=> 13. Earning, book value, and sector specific multiples in valuation, Ch 18-20 Damodaran
=> 13. Dividend Discount Model
=> 13. Free Cash Flow to Equity Model
=> 13. Valuation using comparable trading multiples
=> 14. Bond Valuation
=> 15. Valuing Forwards and Futures
=> 16. Valuing multi-national global firms
=> Takeovers and Acquisitions
=> Probabilistic Approaches: Scenario Analysis, Decision Trees and Simulations
=> Continuous Compounding
=> Hedging with Options
=> Prime and scores
-----------------------------
Financial Management (bachelor-level, Eugene F. Brigham and Joel F. Houston, Fundamentals of Financial Management) Heilbronn 2008-2012 (prior lectures at Cal State Long Beach and the University of Wisconsin-Madison)
-----------------------------
=> Course Outline
=> A Sample Exam for Financial Management
=> The Financial Environment: Markets, Institutions, and Interest Rates (Capital Markets and Financial Institutions)
=> Time Value of Money and Loan Amortization
=> Risk, Portfolio Theory, CAPM, Beta, and the Security Market Line
=> Types and Sources of Financing; Bond Valuation
=> Stock Valuation
=> The Cost of Capital
=> Capital Budgeting (Investment Planning Basics and Procedures for Investment Analysis)
=> Drivatives and risk Management
=> Project Evaluation: Risk and Cash Flow Estimation; Scenario Analysis and Simulation (Financial Planning to Avoid Insolvency)
=> Dividends and Share Repurchases
=> Real options
=> Capital Structure
=> Financial Planning and Forecasting
=> Managing the Current Assets
=> Financing the current assets
=> Multinational Financial Management
=> Preferred Stocks, Leasing, Warrants, and Convertibles
=> Mergers and Divestitures
=> To Order the Textbook
-----------------------------
Financial Statement Analysis, International Accounting Focused; MBA and Master's (Heilbronn 2010-2012) THE ANALYSIS AND USE OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, GERALD, SONDHL, and WHITE
-----------------------------
=> Student Evaluation of Teaching
=> Course Outline
=> Sample Exam
=> Financial Statements, EVA and a Real World Example for Calculating EVA, Ratio Analysis, Percentage Change in Accounting Statements and Comparision to Industry Averages, with Interpretation from the Point of View of Investing in the Firm's Stocks.
=> Analysis of Financial Statements, Ratio Analysis, and Du Pont system
-----------------------------
Excel sheets for Prof. Azarmi's Lectures
-----------------------------
=> Finance Tutorials
-----------------------------
Improvements Made due to Student Teaching Evaluation Feedback
-----------------------------
=> What Did I Change as the Result of Feedback through Teaching Evaluations in 2010?
=> What Did I Change as the Result of Feedback through Teaching Evaluations in 2011?
Loading...